互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺消費者個人信息權(quán)益反壟斷法保護
網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理 6期
孫夢如
(南京審計大學(xué)法學(xué)院,江蘇南京211815)
摘要: 在數(shù)字經(jīng)濟時代,數(shù)據(jù)是數(shù)字經(jīng)濟的核心生產(chǎn)要素。個人隱私數(shù)據(jù)事關(guān)消費者的切身利益,算法在提升互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺智能化服務(wù)水平的同時,也提高了個人隱私數(shù)據(jù)保護的難度。大數(shù)據(jù)的發(fā)展加速了隱私保護與反壟斷法的交融,將隱私數(shù)據(jù)等非價格因素納入反壟斷法保護的價值目標(biāo)之中,越來越受到理論界和實務(wù)界專家學(xué)者的認(rèn)同,但反壟斷法介入消費者隱私保護存在制度短板限制了其本身具有的保護優(yōu)勢。鑒于此,從法律制度出發(fā),在價值層面、分析方法和基本制度方面對反壟斷法進行適當(dāng)調(diào)整,來擴大消費者福利指標(biāo)范圍、發(fā)展替代性分析工具、引入均衡性原則衡量利益沖突以適應(yīng)數(shù)字市場經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展。
中圖分類號:D92
文獻標(biāo)識碼:A
DOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2023.06.008
引用格式:孫夢如.互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺消費者個人信息權(quán)益反壟斷法保護[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2023,42(6):48-53.
文獻標(biāo)識碼:A
DOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2023.06.008
引用格式:孫夢如.互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺消費者個人信息權(quán)益反壟斷法保護[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2023,42(6):48-53.
Protection of consumer personal information rights and interests on Internet platforms under the antimonopoly law
Sun Mengru
(School of Law, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815, China)
Abstract: In the digital economy era, data is the core production factor of the digital economy. Personal privacy data is related to the vital interests of consumers, and algorithms not only improve the intelligent service level of Internet platforms, but also increase the difficulty of protecting personal privacy data. The development of big data has accelerated the integration of privacy protection and antimonopoly law, incorporating non price factors such as private data into the value objectives of antimonopoly law protection, which is increasingly recognized by theoretical and practical experts and scholars. However, the institutional shortcomings of antimonopoly law intervention in consumer privacy protection limit its own protection advantages. In view of this, starting from the legal system, through the aspects of value, analysis method and basic system, antimonopoly law is properly adjusted to expand the range of consumer welfare indicators, develop alternative analysis tools, and introduce the principle of balance to measure conflicts of interest to adapt to the development of digital market economy.
Key words : individual information protection; antimonopoly; consumer welfare; Alexi component formula
0 引言
2022年6月24日,我國通過了關(guān)于修改反壟斷法的決定,新修訂《反壟斷法》強調(diào)經(jīng)營者不能利用數(shù)據(jù)和算法實施壟斷行為。當(dāng)前,對數(shù)字經(jīng)濟規(guī)范主要采用反壟斷方式,并取得了積極效果。數(shù)據(jù)的自由流通是企業(yè)提高經(jīng)濟效率、促進經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的重要媒介,但同時也對消費者個人隱私安全造成了一定威脅。對“數(shù)據(jù)隱私保護是否需要反壟斷法介入進行監(jiān)管”的討論濫觴于2007年Google并購DdoubleClick案。理論界對于該問題有不同的認(rèn)識,有學(xué)者持獨立保護模式立場,認(rèn)為數(shù)字時代的到來使得數(shù)據(jù)隱私保護與價格保護同等重要,應(yīng)將其作為一項獨立的消費者福利內(nèi)容而被反壟斷法保護。公法與私法對隱私的保護存在著明顯的不足,需要反壟斷加以維護。相反,有學(xué)者認(rèn)為侵害消費者個人信息權(quán)益等侵權(quán)行為,繞開侵權(quán)法推理模式而取道于競爭法并非明智之舉,裁判應(yīng)當(dāng)建立在嚴(yán)密的推理之上。然而,也有部分學(xué)者采取中立的態(tài)度,認(rèn)為加強個人信息保護與價格保護處于同等重要的地位,對其保護采用附屬保護與獨立保護并重的方式。
本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請下載:http://theprogrammingfactory.com/resource/share/2000005373
作者信息:
孫夢如
(南京審計大學(xué)法學(xué)院,江蘇南京211815)
此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。