《電子技術(shù)應(yīng)用》
您所在的位置:首頁(yè) > 通信與網(wǎng)絡(luò) > 設(shè)計(jì)應(yīng)用 > 網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)個(gè)人信息“告知同意”規(guī)則的困境與出路
網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)個(gè)人信息“告知同意”規(guī)則的困境與出路
網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理
袁瑩瑩
中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)法學(xué)院
摘要: 伴隨著“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+大數(shù)據(jù)”的快速發(fā)展,各種網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)蜂擁而出,個(gè)人信息以龐大的體量匯聚在網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái),傳統(tǒng)的格式條款已不再滿(mǎn)足個(gè)人信息領(lǐng)域告知同意規(guī)則的適用。大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代,個(gè)人信息利用和保護(hù)之間利益失衡,網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)作為個(gè)人信息利用的重要主體,在處理個(gè)人信息的持續(xù)性、規(guī)模性等方面對(duì)個(gè)人信息權(quán)益保護(hù)提出更高的要求。鑒于自主性,個(gè)人信息主體應(yīng)強(qiáng)化信息自主意識(shí)。鑒于多元性,個(gè)人信息領(lǐng)域的告知同意規(guī)則應(yīng)呈現(xiàn)開(kāi)放式結(jié)構(gòu),以便在信息利用和信息保護(hù)之間尋找平衡。鑒于不平等性,網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)應(yīng)遵守誠(chéng)信原則,履行忠實(shí)義務(wù)。鑒于持續(xù)性,網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)治理應(yīng)成為個(gè)人信息持續(xù)利用的關(guān)鍵。
中圖分類(lèi)號(hào):DF0;D913文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼:ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2024.10.013
引用格式:袁瑩瑩.網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)個(gè)人信息“告知同意”規(guī)則的困境與出路[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2024,43(10):83-90.
The dilemma and way out for the network platform to process personal information to inform consent
Yuan Yingying
Law School, People′s Public Security University of China
Abstract: With the rapid development of "Internet+big data", various network platforms have swarmed out, and personal information has gathered on the network platform in a huge volume. The traditional format terms no longer meet the application of the rules of informed consent in the field of personal information. In the era of big data, the interests between the utilization and protection of personal information are unbalanced. As an important subject of personal information utilization, the network platform puts forward higher requirements for the protection of personal information rights in terms of the continuity and scale of personal information processing. In view of autonomy, the subject of personal information should strengthen the awareness of information autonomy. In view of the diversity, the rules of informing consent in the field of personal information should present an open structure in order to find a balance between information utilization and information protection. In view of the inequality, the network platform should abide by the principle of good faith and fulfill the duty of loyalty. In view of sustainability, network platform governance should become the key to the sustainable use of personal information.
Key words : network platform;personal information; inform consent

引言

隨著大數(shù)據(jù)的迅速發(fā)展,個(gè)人信息顯得愈發(fā)重要,一方面?zhèn)€人信息主體可以利用個(gè)人信息享受各種便捷快速的服務(wù),如指紋登錄、人臉識(shí)別等,另一方面?zhèn)€人信息在各大網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)的流通和處理,促進(jìn)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展。個(gè)人信息在帶來(lái)巨大價(jià)值的同時(shí),也存在巨大的安全隱患,個(gè)人信息主體作為信息的擁有者,理所當(dāng)然享有對(duì)于個(gè)人信息的支配和控制權(quán),但隨著數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷發(fā)展,個(gè)人信息不僅僅具有私人屬性,同時(shí)也具有社會(huì)屬性?!吨腥A人民共和國(guó)個(gè)人信息保護(hù)法》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)《個(gè)人信息保護(hù)法》)基于保護(hù)個(gè)人信息權(quán)益,規(guī)范個(gè)人信息處理活動(dòng),促進(jìn)個(gè)人信息合理利用的目的,在第二章確立了“告知同意”規(guī)則,該規(guī)則確立的理論基礎(chǔ)是個(gè)人信息自決權(quán),但在司法實(shí)踐當(dāng)中,關(guān)于“告知同意”規(guī)則的運(yùn)用仍存在諸多問(wèn)題。本文圍繞網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)在處理個(gè)人信息時(shí)“告知同意”規(guī)則的應(yīng)用展開(kāi)思考,主要討論了網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)處理個(gè)人信息時(shí)是否對(duì)個(gè)人信息主體履行了告知義務(wù)、告知義務(wù)的履行是否清晰有效、個(gè)人信息主體根據(jù)告知內(nèi)容所作出的同意表示是否真實(shí)。如何突破這些困境是推動(dòng)個(gè)人信息利用和強(qiáng)化個(gè)人信息保護(hù)這兩架馬車(chē)并駕齊驅(qū)的關(guān)鍵,仍需要進(jìn)一步的研究。


本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請(qǐng)下載:

http://theprogrammingfactory.com/resource/share/2000006201


作者信息:

袁瑩瑩

(中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)法學(xué)院,北京100038)


Magazine.Subscription.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。