《電子技術(shù)應(yīng)用》
您所在的位置:首頁 > 人工智能 > 設(shè)計應(yīng)用 > 論人工智能民事主體資格之否定
論人工智能民事主體資格之否定
網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理
陳思敏,蔡唱
海南大學(xué)法學(xué)院
摘要: 人工智能的民事主體資格是人工智能發(fā)展過程中亟需解決的重要問題。首先,承認(rèn)人工智能民事主體資格有破壞人類中心地位的傾向,違背民事主體制度所蘊含的人文精神。為人類服務(wù)的人工智能不具有獨立意志,無法取得與民事主體同等的法律地位,不符合平等理念的要求。其次,人工智能具有可復(fù)制性,缺乏個體差異性,無法以自己名義從事民事活動。人工智能受到人類的控制和決定,不具備獨立自主性,不享有獨立財產(chǎn),無法獨立對外承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任,不滿足民事主體的各個構(gòu)成要件。最后,人工智能僅具有技術(shù)層面的理性,區(qū)別于人類理性,缺乏民事預(yù)設(shè)主體的理性基礎(chǔ)。
中圖分類號:D923文獻標(biāo)識碼:ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2024.09.012
引用格式:陳思敏,蔡唱.論人工智能民事主體資格之否定[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2024,43(9):71-76,83.
The discussion on the denial of civil subject qualification of artificial intelligence
Chen Simin,Cai Chang
Law School, Hainan University
Abstract: The civil subject qualification of artificial intelligence is an important problem to be solved urgently in the development of artificial intelligence. First of all, recognizing the qualification of artificial intelligence as a civil subject undermines the central position of human beings, and violates the humanistic spirit contained in the civil subject system. Artificial intelligence for human beings doesn′t have independent will, can′t achieve the same status as a civil subject, and doesn′t meet the requirements of the concept of equality. Secondly, artificial intelligence is reproducible and lacks individual differences, so it can′t engage in civil activities in its own name. Artificial intelligence is controlled and decided by human beings. It doesn′t have independence and independent property, and can′t bear civil liability independently. In all, Artificial intelligence doesn′t meet the elements of civil subjects. Finally, artificial intelligence only has technical rationality, which is different from human rationality. So it lacks the rational basis of civil presupposition subject.
Key words : artificial intelligence; civil subject qualification; humanistic spirit; equality and rationality; independent

引言

現(xiàn)代科技的發(fā)展帶動著人工智能呈現(xiàn)出對人類的“超模擬”,促使其智能化程度越來越高。人工智能不僅給人類生產(chǎn)生活帶來諸多便利,也引發(fā)了一系列的法律問題,譬如人工智能的民事主體資格問題、人工智能侵權(quán)的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題、人工智能生成物的定性和歸屬問題。人工智能的民事主體資格問題是諸多問題中最基本和最重要的問題,人工智能的主體(或客體)定位影響著侵權(quán)責(zé)任的分配和承擔(dān),關(guān)系著人工智能生成物的保護與否問題。

學(xué)界針對人工智能的民事主體資格出現(xiàn)了爭論,肯定說認(rèn)為應(yīng)當(dāng)賦予人工智能民事主體資格,將其擬制為“電子法人” “電子人”或“代理人”等。否定說認(rèn)為人工智能是人類發(fā)明創(chuàng)造出來的技術(shù)工具,屬于民事客體,不可賦予其民事主體資格。折中說則主張不賦予人工智能完整的民事主體資格,而是承認(rèn)人工智能的有限主體資格,僅享有有限的權(quán)利,承擔(dān)有限的義務(wù)和責(zé)任,同時也否認(rèn)智能化程度較低的人工智能的民事主體資格。

為迎接人工智能技術(shù)發(fā)展帶來的各種挑戰(zhàn)和風(fēng)險,應(yīng)依據(jù)民事主體制度蘊含的人文精神和平等理念判斷人工智能的民法地位,從民事主體的構(gòu)成要件逐一考察人工智能是否符合條件,從民事主體的理性基礎(chǔ)分析人工智能是否具備人類理性,并慎重考慮人工智能的民事主體資格問題,不可簡單隨意地承認(rèn)或者否定人工智能的主體資格。


本文詳細內(nèi)容請下載:

http://theprogrammingfactory.com/resource/share/2000006167


作者信息:

陳思敏,蔡唱

(海南大學(xué)法學(xué)院,海南???70228)


Magazine.Subscription.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。